🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," commented the MEP supporting the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and fit for children," stated a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain figures to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries show that states internationally are no longer willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.