🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."