What Exactly Has Gone Awry at Zipcar – and the UK Car-Sharing Market Finished?

The community kitchen in Rotherhithe has distributed a large number of cooked meals each week for the past two years to pensioners and vulnerable locals in south London. However, their operations have been thrown into disarray by the news that they will lose cars and vans on New Year’s Day.

This organization had relied on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that allowed its cars from the street. The company caused shock across London when it declared it would cease its UK operations from 1 January.

It will mean many helpers will be unable to pick up supplies from a major food charity, which gathers excess produce from supermarkets, cafes and restaurants. Other options are less convenient, more expensive, or do not offer the same convenient access.

“The impact will be massively,” stated Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “My team and I are worried about the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours will face difficulties.”

“Knowing the reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How are we going to carry on?”

A Major Blow for City Vehicle Clubs

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London registered as car club members, now potentially left without convenient access to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. The vast majority of those members were likely with Zipcar, which had a near-monopoly position in the city.

This shutdown, subject to consultation with staff, is a big blow to the vision that car sharing in cities could reduce the need for owning a car. Yet, some experts have noted that Zipcar’s departure need not mean the demise for the concept in Britain.

The Potential of Shared Mobility

Car sharing is valued by city planners and green advocates as a way of reducing the problems associated with vehicle ownership. Typically, vehicles sit as two-tonne dead weights on the street for the vast majority of the time, occupying parking. They also require large CO2 output to produce, and people without a vehicle tend to walk, cycle and take public transport more. That helps urban areas – reducing congestion and pollution – and boosts people’s health through more exercise.

What Went Wrong?

The company started in 2000 before being bought by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues barely registered compared with its owner's total earnings, and a loss that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “broader transformation across our global operations, where we are taking targeted actions to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Zipcar’s most recent accounts noted revenues had declined as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “These changes reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which continues to suppress demand for non-essential services,” it said.

The Capital's Specific Hurdles

However, industry observers noted that London has particular issues that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.

  • Inconsistent Rules: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and costs that made it harder.
  • New Costs: The closure comes as electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
  • Parking Permit Disparity: Locals in some boroughs pay just £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a major disincentive.

“Our fees should be one-twentieth of a private parking cost,” argued Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

A European Example

Nations in Europe offer examples for London to follow. Germany introduced national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, subsidies and exemptions. Now, the country has several shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“What we see is that shared mobility around the world, particularly on the continent, is growing,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

Devanathan said authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of mass transit, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was looking at entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

What Comes Next?

Other players can be split into two models:

  1. Fleet Operators: Which maintain their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Person-to-Person Rentals: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – similar to Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

Turo, a US-headquartered P2P service, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “significant chance” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take some time for other players to build momentum. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and many across London will be without a convenient option.

For Rotherhithe community kitchen, the next month will be a scramble to find a way. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the broader impact of its departure on vital services and the future of shared mobility in the UK.

Virginia Lopez
Virginia Lopez

Elena is a seasoned journalist and blogger with a passion for uncovering unique stories and sharing practical lifestyle advice.